Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824934›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

"What happens when you get corona?": Children's questions and parental responses about the COVID-19 pandemic.

Graciela Trujillo Hernández, David Menendez, Seung Heon Yoo, Rebecca E Klapper, Maria H Schapfel, Kailee A Sowers, Victoria E Welch, Karl S Rosengren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Graciela Trujillo HernándezDepartment of Psychology and Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7622-9157
David MenendezDepartment of Psychology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0248-5940
Seung Heon YooDepartment of Psychology and Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Rebecca E KlapperDepartment of Psychology and Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-0631
Maria H SchapfelDepartment of Psychology and Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Kailee A SowersDepartment of Psychology and Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Victoria E WelchDepartment of Psychology and Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Karl S RosengrenDepartment of Psychology and Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information discussed between parents and children provide a foundation for children's developing understanding of health and illness. Parents of 3-to-7-year-old children (N = 516, 62% female, 78% White) residing in the United States were recruited using Amazon's Mechanical Turk during July 29th- August 10th, 2020. We asked parents to report three questions that their children had asked about the COVID-19 pandemic and asked them to report how they responded to those questions. Children's questions focused on lifestyle changes (22%), while parental responses were often about the virus (23%). We examined the stability of content of children's questions and parental responses between the first peak and second peak of infection and death rates due to COVID-19 in the United States. The topic of children's questions and the types of parental responses shifted between the two peaks, such that parents during the second peak of the pandemic reported their children asking more frequently about the virus and preventive measures than children in the first peak. Meanwhile, parents during the second peak of infection and death rates were more focused on responding to their children's questions with information about the virus. We used Latent Class Analysis to explore overall patterns in children's questions and parents' responses. For children's questions, three latent classes were obtained: (1) the virus [39%], (2) the virus/lifestyle changes [21%], and (3) lifestyle changes/preventive measures [40%]. For parents' responses three latent classes were found: (1) the virus/self-protection [54%], (2) reassurance/the virus [28%], and (3) simple yes/no answers without further explanation [17%]. These results suggest that children's questions and parental responses can be captured in terms of a discrete number of latent classes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health LiteracyParentsAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisLife StyleMalePandemicsParent-Child RelationsSARS-CoV-2Self ReportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40824934
PMCPMC12360530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.