Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824913›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Testing the role of online group-based supervision for local humanitarian workers following a crisis: A mixed-methods longitudinal study.

Gülşah Kurt, Fatema Almeamari, Hafsa El-Dardery, Aya Kardouh, Scarlett Wong, Michael McGrath, Louis Klein, Ammar Beetar, Salah Lekkeh, Ahmed El-Vecih and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Gülşah KurtSchool of Psychology, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7820-1230
Fatema AlmeamariDepartment of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5774-2433
Hafsa El-DarderyDepartment of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Aya KardouhDepartment of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Scarlett WongSchool of Population Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Michael McGrathDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0465-176X
Louis KleinDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Ammar BeetarHope Revival Organization, Gaziantep, Türkiye.
Salah LekkehHope Revival Organization, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6624-0001
Ahmed El-VecihHope Revival Organization, Gaziantep, Türkiye.
Wael YasakiHope Revival Organization, Gaziantep, Türkiye.
Ceren AcarturkDepartment of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Dusan Hadzi-PavlovicDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2059-3865
Zachary SteelDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Simon RosenbaumDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Ruth WellsDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquakes caused widespread destruction, leaving millions without access to basic needs and services. Caring for Carers (C4C), an online group-based supervision program for Syrian mental health workers, started three months prior to the earthquakes. This study examined the role of this program in supporting the mental and occupational health of the participants following this crisis. A mixed-method longitudinal design was employed with Syrian mental health workers in Türkiye and Northwest Syria (N = 55, 45.5% female), including 16 months of survey data on psychological distress (Kessler-6) and compassion satisfaction (ProQOL), semi-structured interviews with supervisors (N = 10), and video recordings of supervision sessions (N = 9). A piecewise mixed-effects model within a Bayesian Hierarchical framework was used to assess changes in outcomes across three periods: the active control period (7 months), pre-earthquake supervision period (3 months), and post-earthquake supervision period (6 months). The thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data from the interviews and supervision sessions. Quantitative findings showed a significant reduction in psychological distress and an increase in compassion satisfaction during the post-earthquake supervision period (b = -0.18, error = 0.06, CrI = -0.29, -0.07, b = 0.26, error = 0.04, CrI = 0.18, 0.35, respectively). These changes were significantly different from the active control period (b = 0.21, error = 0.05, CrI = 0.11, 0.31, b = -0.37, error = 0.04, CrI = -0.45, -0.28, respectively) while no significant differences were observed between the active control and pre-earthquake supervision periods. Thematic analysis identified five features of supervision as a safe space and two functions as a source of emotional and practical support after the earthquakes. Overall, these findings provide evidence for both the protective and promotive role of supervision among Syrian mental health workers, highlighting the key mechanisms through which it may foster resilience and strength in humanitarian settings.

Identifiers

PMID40824913
PMCPMC12360539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.