ArticlePloS one2025
Community-based health insurance dropout and its determinants among women in Sidama National Regional State, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A multilevel analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Women's Intention to Maintain Enrollment in Community-Based Health Insurance: A Multilevel Analysis in the Sidama Region, Southern Ethiopia, 2024.Health services insights · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEnsuring accessible and affordable healthcare continues to be a key priority in low- and middle-income countries, including Ethiopia. To enhance healthcare coverage and provide financial protection, especially for vulnerable populations such as women, community-based health insurance (CBHI) schemes have been introduced. Despite these efforts, dropout rates from the program remain a challenge, threatening its long-term sustainability. This study investigated determinants of CBHI dropout among women in Sidama Regional State, Ethiopia.
methodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted between December 15, 2023, and January 12, 2024, involving 835 women aged 18 years and above in the central zone of Sidama. Participants were selected via a multistage sampling technique. Data were collected through structured, pre-tested face-to-face interviews encompassing demographic, household, and scheme-related factors. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed using Stata version 17 to identify factors associated with CBHI dropout. Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were reported, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
findingsAmong the 845 women sampled, 835 participated in the interviews with a response rate of 98.8%. Of these, 77 women (9%) dropped from the CBHI scheme (AOR = 9; 95% CI: 7.43% -11.38%; p < 0.001). Lower dropout likelihood was significantly associated with increased age (AOR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97; p < 0.001) and larger family size (AOR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.17-0.50; p < 0.001). Conversely, reduced transparency in decision-making (AOR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.39-3.00; p < 0.001) and insufficient advocacy (AOR = 3.01; 95% CI: 2.29-7.00; p = 0.011) were positively associated with dropout. At the community level, residing in low-poverty areas (AOR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09-0.98; p = 0.046) and high-autonomy communities (AOR = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.04-0.50; p = 0.002) were associated with reduced dropout rates.
conclusionThis study identified factors linked with women's dropout from the CBHI program that threaten sustainability. Lower dropout rates were linked with older age and larger family size, while poor transparency in decision-making and weak advocacy were associated with increased dropout rates. Communities residing in low-poverty and high-autonomy areas were also associated with decreased dropouts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.