Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824818›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2025

A Scoping Review of Oral Feeding Skill Development in Typically Developing Children Part I: Methodologies, Populations, and Normative Data.

Amy L Delaney, Anna Flatt, Hannah Koepp, Alissa V Fial, Katherine C Hustad

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy L DelaneyMarquette University, Milwaukee, WI.ORCID 0000-0003-4731-9038
Anna FlattMarquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
Hannah KoeppMarquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
Alissa V FialMarquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
Katherine C HustadUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID 0000-0002-8544-7754

Funding

Clincal and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000055 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2012 to 2015
$11.3M
Waisman Center Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterP50HD105353 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiang Chang · 2021 to 2026
$8.5M
Differential Diagnosis of Functional Speech Deficits in Children with Cerebral PalsyR01DC015653 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine C Hustad · 2016 to 2026
$4.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000055NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105353NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis scoping review is the first in a two-part series aimed at synthesizing literature on oral feeding skills and informing the development of a classification system of observable skills. This article consolidates research on feeding skill development in typically developing children. The second paper analyzes individual skills identified. This review addresses three questions: (a) What methods have been used to study feeding skill development? (b) What populations of typically developing children without feeding disorders have been studied? (c) What normative data on feeding skills are available?

methodFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, studies were included if they examined oral feeding skills in typically developing children born at ≥ 37 weeks gestation, aged at least 4 months, with a focus on skills related to drinking liquids by cup and eating solids, using direct observation.

resultsFourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Findings revealed significant methodological variability, particularly in the number of skills assessed, feeding procedures used, and participant characteristics. While some normative data exist, they were limited and inconsistently reported. A key challenge was the lack of standardized definitions and categorization of feeding skills, which limited cross-study comparisons.

conclusionsMultiple approaches have been used to study typical feeding skill development, presenting an opportunity for methodological standardization. Greater clarity around individual feeding skills, addressed in Part 2, may help resolve inconsistencies in developmental timelines and support the development of an observational clinical measure.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentFeeding BehaviorInfant BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantMaleReference Values

Identifiers

PMID40824818
PMCPMC12452823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.