ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2025
A Scoping Review of Oral Feeding Skill Development in Typically Developing Children Part I: Methodologies, Populations, and Normative Data.
Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioural Interventions and Botulinum Toxin Injections for Drooling, Swallowing, Feeding, and Oral-Motor Outcomes in Children: A Domain-Specific Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A Scoping Review of Oral Feeding Skill Development in Typically Developing Children Part II: Exploring Variability in Oral Feeding Skill Descriptions.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Article
- A Scoping Review of Oral Feeding Skill Development in Typically Developing Children Part I: Methodologies, Populations, and Normative Data.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis scoping review is the first in a two-part series aimed at synthesizing literature on oral feeding skills and informing the development of a classification system of observable skills. This article consolidates research on feeding skill development in typically developing children. The second paper analyzes individual skills identified. This review addresses three questions: (a) What methods have been used to study feeding skill development? (b) What populations of typically developing children without feeding disorders have been studied? (c) What normative data on feeding skills are available?
methodFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, studies were included if they examined oral feeding skills in typically developing children born at ≥ 37 weeks gestation, aged at least 4 months, with a focus on skills related to drinking liquids by cup and eating solids, using direct observation.
resultsFourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Findings revealed significant methodological variability, particularly in the number of skills assessed, feeding procedures used, and participant characteristics. While some normative data exist, they were limited and inconsistently reported. A key challenge was the lack of standardized definitions and categorization of feeding skills, which limited cross-study comparisons.
conclusionsMultiple approaches have been used to study typical feeding skill development, presenting an opportunity for methodological standardization. Greater clarity around individual feeding skills, addressed in Part 2, may help resolve inconsistencies in developmental timelines and support the development of an observational clinical measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.