Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824697›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

FDA Approval Summary: Nogapendekin Alfa Inbakicept-pmln with BCG for BCG-Unresponsive Carcinoma In Situ.

Brian L Heiss, Elaine Chang, Hee-Koung Joeng, Mallorie H Fiero, Lingshan Wang, Salaheldin S Hamed, Haw-Jyh Chiu, Tiffany K Ricks, Eun Hee Koh, Teegan A Dellibovi-Ragheb and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Brian L HeissCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-7858-841X
Elaine ChangCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6255-2853
Hee-Koung JoengCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0001-1830-6708
Mallorie H FieroCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-5536-116X
Lingshan WangCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-0852-3485
Salaheldin S HamedAstellas Pharma, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-7675-3088
Haw-Jyh ChiuCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0004-4814-6110
Tiffany K RicksCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-2026-0996
Eun Hee KohCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0009-1610-5548
Teegan A Dellibovi-RaghebCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0003-2900-5390
Min WangCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-1500-2821
Christal LeeCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0006-5908-452X
William F PierceCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-3411-7720
John K LeightonCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0009-9739-1258
Nam Atiqur RahmanCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0001-0002-7006
Shenghui TangCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-0437-665X
Richard PazdurOncology Center of Excellence (OCE), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-4771-9923
Laleh Amiri-KordestaniCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-0056-5437
Paul G KluetzParadigm Health, Columbus, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-9796-4791
Daniel L SuzmanCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-1702-6114

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On April 22, 2024, the U.S. FDA granted regular approval to nogapendekin alfa inbakicept-pmln (N-803) with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) for the treatment of adult patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with carcinoma in situ, with or without papillary tumors. Substantial evidence of effectiveness for this application was obtained from cohort A of the single-arm, multicenter QUILT-3.032 trial. Patients received N-803 400 μg administered intravesically with TICE BCG once a week for 6 weeks as induction therapy, a second induction course if complete response (CR) was not achieved at month 3, and maintenance N-803 with BCG weekly for 3 weeks at months 4, 7, 10, 13, and 19 (for a total of 15 maintenance doses). The major efficacy outcome measures were CR at any time [as defined by negative results for cystoscopy [with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT)/biopsies as applicable] per local investigator assessment and urine cytology] and duration of response. The CR rate in the 77-patient efficacy population, per FDA review, was 62% [95% confidence interval (CI), 51%-73%]. Of the 48 patients with a CR, 28 (58%; 95% CI, 26%-55%) and 19 (40%; 95% CI, 16%-36%) maintained a response for ≥12 months and ≥24 months, respectively. The most common adverse reactions were increased creatinine, dysuria, hematuria, urinary frequency, urinary urgency, and urinary tract infection. This article summarizes the data and FDA thought process supporting the approval of N-803 with BCG.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBCG VaccineCarcinoma in SituImmunoconjugatesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedDrug ApprovalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBCG VaccineImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID40824697
PMCPMC12363661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.