Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824660›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2025

Intravenous Argatroban or Eptifibatide in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Subgroup Analysis of the MOST Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ian Rines, Opeolu Adeoye, Andrew D Barreto, Joseph Broderick, Janice Carrozzella, Hui Chen, Mauricio Concha, Jordan Elm, James C Grotta, Adam S Jasne and 7 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03735979 (Multi-arm Optimization of Stroke Thrombolysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03735979 phase3completednot on this map

Multi-arm Optimization of Stroke Thrombolysis (MOST): a Single Blinded, Randomized Controlled Adaptive, Multi-arm, Adjunctive-thrombolysis Efficacy Trial in Ischemic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2019 to 2024Enrolled514ConditionsAcute Ischemic StrokeArmsArgatroban, Eptifibatide, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Error in Figure.JAMA neurology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ian RinesDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Opeolu AdeoyeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Andrew D BarretoDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston.
Joseph BroderickDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Janice CarrozzellaDepartment of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Hui ChenDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Mauricio ConchaDepartment of Neurology, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Intercoastal Medical Group, Sarasota, Florida.
Jordan ElmDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
James C GrottaClinical Institute for Research and Innovation, Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Adam S JasneDepartment of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Pooja KhatriDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Akash RoyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Achala VagalDepartment of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Max WintermarkDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Albert J YooTexas Stroke Institute, Medical City Healthcare, Dallas.
Colin P DerdeynDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville.
MOST Investigators

Funding

Multi-arm Optimization of Stroke Thrombolysis (MOST) Stroke TrialU01NS100699 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ADEOYE, OPEOLU M, BARRETO, ANDREW D · 2018 to 2021
$18.8M
Workshop to Identify Collaborative Project(s) for the NIH StrokeNet and the Japan NEtwork for Clinical Stroke Trials (NECST)U01NS087748 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Catherine R. Dillon, Jordan J. Elm · 2014 to 2026
$14.1M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS087748NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS100699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The addition of direct thrombin inhibitors or glycoprotein platelet inhibitors to intravenous thrombolysis in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke may improve reperfusion rates and clinical outcomes. Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of these agents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a preplanned cohort analysis from the Multi-Arm Optimization of Stroke Thrombolysis (MOST) randomized clinical trial, which lasted from 2019 to 2023 with a 90-day follow-up. Centrally read outcomes were assessed blinded to treatment. The MOST study was a multicenter, multiarm, adaptive, single-blind, phase 3 trial that included patients with acute ischemic stroke who were selected for thrombectomy per standard of care. Interventions: Patients were randomized to placebo, argatroban, or eptifibatide within 75 minutes of intravenous thrombolysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 90-day utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (UW-mRS) score (range, 0-10, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes) was used as the primary outcome measure. Reperfusion rates and safety (hemorrhage rates) were also assessed, where good reperfusion was defined as a Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/2c/3 on the completion angiogram. Results: A total of 5376 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these individuals, 4332 did not meet inclusion criteria, 251 eligible patients did not have consent obtained, 279 were excluded for other reasons, and 514 were randomized in the MOST trial. A total of 254 were planned for thrombectomy (110 in the placebo group, 31 in the argatroban group, and 113 in the eptifibatide group). Mean (SD) age was 68 (14.3) years, and 134 (53%) were female. Of these patients, 219 received thrombectomy: 94 in the placebo group, 27 in the argatroban group, and 98 in the eptifibatide group. There was no effect of treatment on outcome (mean UW-mRS score: eptifibatide, 6.47; 95% CI, 5.79-7.15; argatroban, 5.35; 95% CI, 4.13-6.58; placebo, 6.68; 95% CI, 5.98-7.39). Rates of good reperfusion were similar between groups (83 of 92 in the placebo group [83%]; 17 of 27 in the argatroban group [63%], and 82 of 98 in the eptifibatide group [84%]). The proportion of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this secondary analysis of the MOST randomized clinical trial reveal that the addition of argatroban or eptifibatide to intravenous thrombolysis was not associated with better reperfusion rates or clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. Future investigations of these agents as intravenous adjuncts to thrombectomy should focus on populations who are ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03735979.

Identifiers

PMID40824660
PMCPMC12362272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.