ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2025
Exploring determinants in deciding the optimal antimicrobial dose in patients undergoing CRRT: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial dosing in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a clinical challenge. The study aimed to investigate the factors that influence appropriate antimicrobial doses in CRRT and to address gaps in current knowledge and practice. The mixed-method design involved two phases. For the quantitative phase, infectious disease, intensive care, and clinical pharmacy professionals completed a questionnaire assessing demographics and practice details, as well as their knowledge, attitudes, and practices on antibiotic dosing in CRRT. In the qualitative phase, online focus groups were conducted using a question schedule based on the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore challenges and expectations. A structured questionnaire was completed by 160 participants, most of whom were infectious disease specialists (61.3%) with over 10 years of experience (38.8%). Despite a high knowledge level of antimicrobial dosing during CRRT, the sieving coefficient was unclear at 74.4%. Although 96.3% reported adjusting doses, 78.8% lacked institutional guidelines, and 68.1% did not monitor drug levels. CRRT experience positively influenced knowledge and attitude scores, and different dosing practices were reported for meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and vancomycin. Qualitative findings highlighted the need for standard guidelines and CRRT-specific training. Multidisciplinary collaboration and real-time monitoring of therapeutic drugs were emphasized. This study identifies key gaps in knowledge and practice regarding antimicrobial dosing in CRRT. Addressing these gaps requires targeted training programs, real-time drug monitoring, and the development of evidence-based dosing guidelines to enhance patient safety and antimicrobial efficacy. Future research should evaluate the impact of these interventions on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.