Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824637›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Over-the-Counter Oral Contraceptive Use and Initiation of Contraception.

Maria I Rodriguez, Haley Burns, Reed Sheridan, Alison B Edelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria I RodriguezCenter for Reproductive Health Equity, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Haley BurnsCenter for Reproductive Health Equity, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Reed SheridanCenter for Reproductive Health Equity, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Alison B EdelmanCenter for Reproductive Health Equity, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration approved the first over-the-counter (OTC) oral contraceptive pill (OCP) in 2023, potentially expanding access to contraception. Understanding whether OTC availability reaches individuals with systemic barriers to care is essential to assessing its public health impact. Objective: To evaluate whether the newly available OTC progestin-only OCP is reaching individuals not previously using contraception or who rely on less-effective methods. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used baseline data from a national, prospective US cohort. Participants were individuals aged 15 to 45 years obtaining OCPs at pharmacies or online between April 2024 and February 2025. Participants were eligible if they obtained an OCP (prescription or OTC) for contraceptive use and were at risk of pregnancy. Exposure: Obtaining an OTC progestin-only OCP vs a prescription OCP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were (1) initiation of contraception among individuals previously not using any modern method and (2) transition from a less-effective method (eg, condoms or emergency contraception) to OCP use. Multivariable logistic regression models with robust SEs were used to determine adjusted absolute estimated probabilities and percentage point differences in outcomes. Results: The sample included 986 individuals, predominantly single (692 participants [70.2%]), and the largest proportion was aged 20 to 24 years (338 participants [34.3%]). OTC OCP users accounted for 320 (32.5%) of the participants. Individuals using the OTC option were more likely to be uninsured (101 participants [31.6%] vs 23 participants [3.5%]) and to reside in rural areas (46 participants [14.4%] vs 56 participants [8.4%]) compared with prescription users. Groups did not differ in fertility preferences. OTC use of contraception was associated with a 31.8 percentage point increase (95% CI, 24.1-39.5 percentage points) in moving from nonuse of contraception to the OTC pill, when compared with prescription OCP users. Similarly, OTC access was associated with a 41.0 percentage point increase (95% CI, 33.8-48.1 percentage points) in transitioning from use of a less-effective method of contraception to the OTC pill. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US individuals obtaining oral contraception, the OCP was accessed OTC by many who previously used no method or less-effective contraception. These findings suggest that OTC access may improve equitable access to contraception.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptives, OralNonprescription DrugsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultContraceptives, OralNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID40824637
PMCPMC12362221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.