Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824610›Full record

ReviewDiscover oncology2025

T cell redirecting therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma.

Melinda S Y Tan, Tamer Hellou, David Dingli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melinda S Y Tan *Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Tamer Hellou *Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
David DingliDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. dingli.david@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the utilization of immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors and CD38 targeting monoclonal antibodies has led to significant improvements in the overall outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma. Despite these advances, relapse remains common, and until recently, the prognosis of such patients was guarded. The approval of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells and T-cell engagers (TCE) have considerably improved the survival in these patients with triple and penta-class refractory disease. This paper reviews the clinical outcomes associated with these novel immunotherapeutic agents, including their associated toxicities, their role and optimal sequencing within the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma. The importance of supportive care in managing these patients will be discussed. Finally, we offer a perspective on emerging developments in the immunotherapy of relapsed multiple myeloma.

Identifiers

PMID40824610
PMCPMC12361006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.