ArticleJAMA2025
Stapokibart for Severe Uncontrolled Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: The CROWNS-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CM310 in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial of Preoperative Stapokibart With Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- New advances in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps from pathophysiology to biologic targeted therapy.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Pooled it
- Rethinking Monospecific Antibody Therapy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Dual- and Multispecific Antibodies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Differences in Biologic Clinical Trials for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps-Are We Comparing Apples With Oranges?International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Review
- Baseline Inflammatory Biomarkers and Disease Burden for Predicting Response to Stapokibart in CRSwNP.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Tregs to tissue remodelling: FOXP3 and IL-35 in the inflammatory landscape of nasal polyps.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Review
- Economic evaluation of stapokibart for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Comprehensive immunological and molecular analysis revealed inflammation-related diagnostic signatures in chronic rhinosinusitis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- [Indications of biological treatment in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Successful Treatment of Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria with Stapokibart After Omalizumab Failure: A Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Dose tapering and treatment de-escalation of biologic therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- A case report of IgA-mediated anti-Laminin-γ1 (p200) pemphigoid successfully treated with stapokibart combined with corticosteroids.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Advance in biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- The Therapeutic Role of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP): A Review of the Current Evidence.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Review
- CRSwNP in the biologics era: evaluating patient-reported quality of life outcomes.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps: the state-of-the-art of current treatment strategies and future developments.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps causes severe symptoms and impaired quality of life. Stapokibart is a novel monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin 4Rα. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of stapokibart as an add-on treatment to intranasal corticosteroids in patients with severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Design, Setting, and Participants: From August 9, 2022, to April 28, 2023, this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial, conducted at 51 hospitals in China, enrolled adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps who had a history of systemic corticosteroid use or sinonasal surgery and a bilateral nasal polyp score of 5 or greater (on a scale of 0-8) and a weekly mean nasal congestion score of 2 or greater (on a scale of 0-3). Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps was defined as blood eosinophils of 6.9% or greater (without asthma) or 3.7% or greater (with asthma) or an eosinophil count of 55 per high-power field or greater or 27% or greater in nasal polyp tissue. Patient follow-up was completed on June 25, 2024. Interventions: Four weeks after initiation of mometasone furoate nasal spray, 100 µg in each nostril daily, patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous stapokibart, 300 mg, or placebo (1:1) every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Both groups then received stapokibart for 28 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Co-primary end points were changes from baseline in nasal polyp score (meaningful change threshold [MCT] ≥1 point) and nasal congestion score (MCT ≥0.5 points) at week 24 in all patients and in the population with eosinophilia. Results: Among 180 patients randomized, 179 (mean age, 45 [SD, 12.9] years; 61 [34.1%] women) received at least 1 treatment dose (n = 90 for stapokibart; n = 89 for placebo). In the overall population, the least-squares (LS) mean change in nasal polyp score from baseline to week 24 in the stapokibart vs placebo groups was -2.6 vs -0.3 points, respectively, (LS mean difference, -2.3; 95% CI, -2.6 to -1.9; P < .001); in the population with eosinophilia, the change was -3.0 vs -0.4 points, respectively (LS mean difference, -2.5; 95% CI, -2.9 to -2.1; P < .001). The LS mean change in nasal congestion score from baseline to week 24 in the stapokibart vs placebo groups was -1.2 vs -0.5 points, respectively, in the overall population (LS mean difference, -0.7; 95% CI, -0.9 to -0.5; P < .001) and -1.3 vs -0.5 points, respectively, in the population with eosinophilia (LS mean difference, -0.8; 95% CI, -1.0 to -0.6; P < .001). Serious adverse events were rare (2.2% in the stapokibart group vs 1.1% in the placebo group). Higher rates of arthralgia (7.8% vs 0%) and hyperuricemia (5.6% vs 1.1%) were reported with stapokibart vs placebo, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps treated with a daily intranasal corticosteroid, stapokibart reduced polyp size and severity of nasal symptoms at 24 weeks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05436275.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.