Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824500›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2025

The impact of vitreous floaters on quality of life: a qualitative study.

Jarinne E Woudstra-de Jong, Sonia S Manning-Charalampidou, Johannes Hans R Vingerling, S J Feike Gerbrandy, Konrad Pesudovs, Jan J Busschbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Clinical characteristics and treatment willingness of outpatients with vitreous floaters: a real-world study in China.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jarinne E Woudstra-de JongRotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Eye Hospital Rotterdam, Schiedamse Vest 160, Rotterdam, 3011 BH, The Netherlands. j.dejong@oogziekenhuis.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7842-2180
Sonia S Manning-CharalampidouRotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Eye Hospital Rotterdam, Schiedamse Vest 160, Rotterdam, 3011 BH, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5477-5499
Johannes Hans R VingerlingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0441-2809
S J Feike GerbrandyOogheelkundig Medisch Centrum Amstelland / Amsterdam Eye Hospital, Diemen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-8975
Konrad PesudovsSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-9369
Jan J BusschbachDepartment of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8602-0381

Funding

Rotterdamse Stichting Blindenbelangen B20220001Stichting voor Ooglijders 2021-09Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Oogziekenhuis 2021S05ZonMw 60-64400-98-210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study we explore the quality-of-life impact of vitreous floaters, and identify all possible issues that may be relevant to a person experiencing floaters, with the aim to define the content of a floaters-specific patient-reported outcome measure, which can help determine the disease burden and benefit of treatment for a patient with floaters. METHODOLOGY: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with patients with floaters. The topic guide was based on an extensive literature review and expert opinion. Interview transcripts were coded into all possible quality-of-life issues that may be relevant to a person experiencing floaters. We grouped these into quality-of-life domains and subdomains, using an earlier framework of quality of life in other ophthalmic diseases.

resultsWe categorized the patients’ reports (N = 44) into 11 quality-of-life domains: activity limitations, visual symptoms, ocular symptoms, general symptoms, health concerns, emotional well-being, social well-being, mobility issues, economic impact, inconveniences, and the need to use coping strategies.

conclusionsVitreous floaters result in specific quality-of-life issues that have not been adequately measured with previous patient-reported outcome measures. When compared to other eye conditions, three previously unidentified issues stand out among patients with floaters: the effects of different lighting conditions, intermittent vision impairment caused by eye movements, and the importance of seeking understanding and support from healthcare providers. Eye care clinicians should recognize these issues when evaluating patients with floaters. The present patient-driven determination of relevant quality-of-life issues can guide initiatives in floaters-specific patient-reported outcome measures.

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeVitreous BodyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchVision DisordersOphthalmologyPatient perspectivePatient-reported outcome measurementQuality of lifeVitreous floaters

Identifiers

PMID40824500
PMCPMC12360991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.