ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2025
Decipherment of disulfidptosis-related mutation profile, chemosensitivity, and prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating the preclinical efficacy of naringenin in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of in vivo studies.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, of which 35-40% suffers recurrence after standard chemotherapy treatment. Disulfidptosis is a novel mode of cell death, which has been found to be associated with tumor environment and prognosis in several tumors. Here, we applied transcriptome profile data of 30 types of tumors, somatic mutation data, and scRNA-seq data of DLBCL patients for analysis. Disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) expression was found to be widely dysregulated across different tumors, and most DRGs displayed obviously high expression in DLBCL. DRGs mutations were correlated to prognosis and chemosensitivity in DLBCL. Molecular docking analysis found the potential binding of some anti-tumor drugs and proteins encoded by mutated DRGs. Besides, scRNA-seq analysis revealed the discrepancy of DRGs expression pattern and biological pathways in diverse cell clusters. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between disulfidptosis-related clusters were mainly enriched in immune response and metabolism related pathways. Moreover, a novel DRGs risk score was constructed and demonstrated to be accurate for prognosis prediction in both training and validation cohorts. Pan-cancer analysis showed that DRGs score displayed wider application value in different types of tumors. Chemosensitivity analysis found that there was great discrepancy of IC50 in 86 anti-tumor drugs between low- and high-DRGs score groups, such as temozolomide and sorafenib. Overall, the novel disulfidptosis-related risk score and biomarkers have the potential to provide new insights for risk stratification and treatment recommendation in DLBCL. KEY MESSAGES: The expression of disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) was significantly different in 30 types of tumors, and most DRGs displayed high expression in DLBCL. DRGs mutations had the potential to predict prognosis and chemosensitivity in DLBCL. Function analysis based on sequencing datasets indicated that DRGs were closely correlated to tumor immune infiltration and metabolism reprogramming. DRGs score was found to be accurate for predicting the prognosis and chemosensitivity in DLBCL. Pan-cancer analysis revealed the prognostic value of DRGs score in different tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40824493What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.