ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
De-escalated Teclistamab dosing in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Czech myeloma group real-world evidence analysis.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Infectious toxicities associated with bispecific antibodies and CAR-T Cells in multiple myeloma: a systematic review.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Real-world incidence of severe infections in multiple myeloma patients receiving bispecific antibodies: a meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and specific toxicity profiles of GPRC5D- versus BCMA-targeted bispecific antibodies in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of clinical trials and real-world studies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Bispecific Antibodies: Strategies Available to Optimize Their Safe Delivery in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates, T-Cell Engager Bispecific Antibodies and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Multiple Myeloma: What's the Current Status?Targeted oncology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teclistamab, a BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody, demonstrates high efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, optimal dosing strategies outside clinical trials remain undefined. Thus, we performed a retrospective, multicentre analysis of 73 RRMM patients treated with teclistamab monotherapy at Czech Myeloma Group centres between 2023 and 2025. The study compared efficacy and safety between patients receiving standard weekly dosing and those with reduced-frequency dosing. The whole cohort had a median age of 67 years; 68.5% were penta-refractory. Dosing was de-escalated in 24.7% of patients, typically within one month of treatment initiation. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.41 months and was comparable between weekly and non-weekly groups (9.1 vs. 11.3 months; p = 0.141), despite a significantly lower relative dose intensity in the latter (60.5% vs. 87.0%; p < 0.001). Infection rates and severe adverse events were similar between groups. A lower incidence of neutropenia was observed with less frequent dosing, but this did not translate into reduced infection burden. In conclusion, in real-world practice, early de-escalation of teclistamab dosing appears to maintain clinical efficacy. These findings support ongoing efforts to individualize treatment schedules with the aim of balancing effectiveness, tolerability, and patient-specific factors in BCMA-targeted therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.