Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824403›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2025

Reproducible meningioma grading across multi-center MRI protocols via hybrid radiomic and deep learning features.

Mohamed J Saadh, Rafid Jihad Albadr, Dharmesh Sur, Anupam Yadav, R Roopashree, Gargi Sangwan, T Krithiga, Zafar Aminov, Waam Mohammed Taher, Mariem Alwan and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mohamed J SaadhFaculty of Pharmacy, Middle East University, 11831, Amman, Jordan.
Rafid Jihad AlbadrAhl al Bayt University, Kerbala, Iraq.
Dharmesh SurMarwadi University Research Center, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Marwadi University Research Center, Marwadi University, Gujarat, 360003, Rajkot, India.
Anupam YadavDepartment of Computer Engineering and Application, GLA University Mathura, 281406, Mathura, India.
R RoopashreeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Gargi SangwanChitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, 174103, Baddi, India.
T KrithigaDepartment of Chemistry, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Zafar AminovDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare Management, Samarkand State Medical University, 18 Amir Temur Street, Samarkand, Uzbekistan.
Waam Mohammed TaherCollege of Nursing, National University of Science and Technology, Dhi Qar, Iraq.
Mariem AlwanPharmacy College, Al-Farahidi University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Mahmood Jasem JawadDepartment of Pharmacy, Al-Zahrawi University College, Karbala, Iraq.
Ali M Ali Al-NuaimiGilgamesh Ahliya University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Bagher FarhoodDepartment of Medical Physics and Radiology, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Islamic Republic of Iran. farhood-b@kaums.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to create a reliable method for preoperative grading of meningiomas by combining radiomic features and deep learning-based features extracted using a 3D autoencoder. The goal was to utilize the strengths of both handcrafted radiomic features and deep learning features to improve accuracy and reproducibility across different MRI protocols. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included 3,523 patients with histologically confirmed meningiomas, consisting of 1,900 low-grade (Grade I) and 1,623 high-grade (Grades II and III) cases. Radiomic features were extracted from T1-contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MRI scans using the Standardized Environment for Radiomics Analysis (SERA). Deep learning features were obtained from the bottleneck layer of a 3D autoencoder integrated with attention mechanisms. Feature selection was performed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Classification was done using machine learning models like XGBoost, CatBoost, and stacking ensembles. Reproducibility was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and batch effects were harmonized with the ComBat method. Performance was assessed based on accuracy, sensitivity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsFor T1-contrast-enhanced images, combining radiomic and deep learning features provided the highest AUC of 95.85% and accuracy of 95.18%, outperforming models using either feature type alone. T2-weighted images showed slightly lower performance, with the best AUC of 94.12% and accuracy of 93.14%. Deep learning features performed better than radiomic features alone, demonstrating their strength in capturing complex spatial patterns. The end-to-end 3D autoencoder with T1-contrast images achieved an AUC of 92.15%, accuracy of 91.14%, and sensitivity of 92.48%, surpassing T2-weighted imaging models. Reproducibility analysis showed high reliability (ICC > 0.75) for 127 out of 215 features, ensuring consistent performance across multi-center datasets.

conclusionsThe proposed framework effectively integrates radiomic and deep learning features to provide a robust, non-invasive, and reproducible approach for meningioma grading. Future research should validate this framework in real-world clinical settings and explore adding clinical parameters to enhance its prognostic value.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaAdultAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsContrast Media3D autoencoderAttention mechanismsDeep learningFeature reproducibilityGradingMeningiomaMRIRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.