Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824388›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2026

Automated Protocol Suggestions for Cranial MRI Examinations Using Locally Fine-tuned BERT Models.

Christian Boschenriedter, Christian Rubbert, Marius Vach, Julian Caspers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christian BoschenriedterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. christian.boschenriedter@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5535-4073
Christian RubbertDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marius VachDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Julian CaspersDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection of appropriate imaging sequences protocols for cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial to address the medical question and adequately support patient care. Inappropriate protocol selection can compromise diagnostic accuracy, extend scan duration, and increase the risk of misdiagnosis. Typically, radiologists determine scanning protocols based on their expertise, a process that can be time-consuming and subject to variability. Language models offer the potential to streamline this process. This study investigates the capability of bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT)-based models to suggest appropriate MRI protocols based on referral information.A total of 410 anonymized electronic referrals for cranial MRI from a local order-entry system were categorized into nine protocol classes by an experienced neuroradiologist. A locally hosted instance of four different, pre-trained BERT-based classifiers (BERT, ModernBERT, GottBERT, and medBERT.de) were trained to classify protocols based on referral entries, including preliminary diagnoses, prior treatment history, and clinical questions. Each model was additionally fine-tuned for local language on a large dataset of electronic referrals.The model based on medBERT.de with local language fine-tuning was the best-performing model and correctly predicted 81% of all protocols, achieving a macro-F1 score of 0.71, macro-precision and macro-recall values of 0.73 and 0.71, respectively. Moreover, we were able to show that local language fine-tuning led to performance improvements across all models.These results demonstrate the potential of language models to predict MRI protocols, even with limited training data. This approach could accelerate and standardize radiological protocol selection, offering significant benefits for clinical workflows.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansReferral and ConsultationBERTMRINeuroradiologyNLPProtocol suggestion

Identifiers

PMID40824388
PMCPMC13009040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.