ArticleClinical neuroradiology2026
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematomas-a German Nationwide Multi-center Study On 718 Embolizations.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Embolic Agents for Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: a Systematic Review and Comparative Pooled Analysis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- Middle meningeal artery embolization in chronic subdural hematoma: a paradigm shift?European radiology · 2026Review
- Determinants of Radiation Exposure in Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Clinical and Radiographic Course Following Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Review
- Current Status of Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An International Perspective Including Japan.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
56 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmbolization of the middle meningeal artery (EMMA) is a promising novel technique for the treatment of patients with chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH).
methodsAfter a nationwide query in Germany, patients with cSDH, treated with EMMA were retrospectively analyzed. Patient and cSDH characteristics, procedural parameters, complications, and rates of treatment failure (TF; residual cSDH > 10 mm, cSDH progression or requirement of rescue surgery) were investigated. TF rates were compared between first-time treatments and treatments of recurrent cSDH, patients receiving embolization and surgery and those being embolized only, different types of embolic agents (particles vs. liquid agents) and between patients with and without antithrombotic medication.
results718 EMMAs (420 unilateral, 149 bilateral) were performed in 569 patients in 30 German neurovascular centers. 57.1% were first-time treatments and 42.9% were treatments of recurrent cSDHs. The most frequently used embolic agents were particles (56.2%), followed by copolymer-based liquid embolic agents (19.6%). The rate of symptomatic procedure-related complications was 2.5%. After a mean follow-up of 6.5 months, TF was observed in 16.2% across all treatments and was more frequent after the treatment of recurrent cSDHs (19.8% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.045) and in patients taking antithrombotic drugs (17.7% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.044). TF was not significantly different regarding the type of embolic agent or additional surgery.
conclusionsIn this nationwide multi-center study, EMMA was associated with favorable clinical outcomes and a low complication rate, supporting the results of recently published randomized controlled trials. TF was more frequent in recurrent cSDH treatments and in patients taking antithrombotic drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.