Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824380›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2025

[Digital health applications from a regulatory perspective-Experiences and current developments].

Florian Strauch, Karl Broich

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Florian StrauchBundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland.
Karl BroichBundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland. leitung@bfarm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2020 digital health applications, or DiGA for short, can be prescribed and reimbursed by health insurance companies, making them one of the pioneers in the integration of digital therapeutics in patient care. The prerequisite for these "apps on prescription" is a listing in the DiGA directory after successfully passing an evaluation process at the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM). The DiGA directory of the BfArM contains information on the individual DiGAs and their properties that are transparent and tailored to the target group. In addition to a positive effect on care a DiGA must meet extensive quality, data protection and security parameters. Of the 59 DiGAs currently available on prescription 28 deal with psychiatric indications. The proof of positive effects on care were overwhelmingly demonstrated in randomized controlled trials. A DiGA should be used after proper diagnostics, determination of indications and education, both as a preparation for therapy and as a supplement to therapy. They can be prescribed by medical or psychotherapeutic practices but also by inpatient treatment providers as part of discharge management. Patients who use DiGAs appreciate their availability in their individual everyday lives, the opportunities for information and exchange within the therapy setting and the increased sense of self-management.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMobile ApplicationsTelemedicineDigital HealthForecastingGermanyHumansDiGA directoryDiGA guideDigital ActFast trackPsychiatric indications

Identifiers

PMID40824380
PMCPMC12411311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.