ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Personalized survival predictions in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: development of a machine learning-based web tool.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning studies for predicting 5-year renal cell cancer survival: a multicenter study.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is a rare subtype of renal cancer, characterized by distinct clinical and genetic features. Existing studies on ChRCC are limited, and there is a critical need to explore the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in this patient population. We used machine learning (ML) to build prognostic models and developed the first predictive web-based tool for survival.
methodsThe SEER database (2000-2020) was used for this study's analysis. To identify the prognostic variables, we conducted Cox regression analysis and constructed prognostic models using five ML algorithms to predict the 5-year survival. A validation method incorporating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to validate the accuracy and reliability of ML models. We also performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
resultsOur study analyzed 10,700 patients with ChRCC and identified metastasis and tumor size as significant predictors of survival. Subtotal nephrectomy was associated with the highest survival rates. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy were infrequently used but were associated with worse survival outcomes, particularly in patients with metastasis. The developed ML models demonstrated high accuracy in predicting survival, and a web-based tool offered real-time survival predictions based on patient-specific data.
conclusionOur study identified key prognostic factors and developed a machine learning-based web tool for personalized survival predictions. Metastasis and tumor size are critical in determining patient outcomes, with subtotal nephrectomy showing the highest survival rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40824376What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.