Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824375›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2025

Epilepsy as a dynamic disease: Toward actionable, individualized seizure risk prediction.

Kai Michael Schubert, Anthony G Marson, Eugen Trinka, Marian Galovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kai Michael SchubertDepartment of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1438-7544
Anthony G MarsonInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-8806
Eugen TrinkaDepartment of Neurology, Neurocritical Care, and Neurorehabilitation, Christian Doppler University Hospital, member of European Reference Network EpiCARE, and Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5950-2692
Marian GalovicDepartment of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2307-071X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current definition of epilepsy allows diagnosis after a single unprovoked seizure if the estimated 10-year recurrence risk is ≥60%. While this framework is grounded in epidemiological evidence, it does not align with the shorter time horizons that guide many clinical and personal decisions. In acquired epilepsies, such as those following stroke, traumatic brain injury, or CNS infections, most recurrences occur within 1-2 years, with risk declining sharply thereafter. This temporal clustering challenges the use of static, long-term risk thresholds in isolation. Dynamic tools, such as the Chance of an Occurrence of a Seizure in the Next Year (COSY) and validated prognostic models (e.g., SeLECT, CAVE, RISE), offer recalculable, near-term estimates that reflect evolving patient status. These metrics can improve communication, inform treatment thresholds through Number Needed to Treat (NNT) calculations, and enhance clinical trial recruitment by targeting periods of highest risk. However, barriers remain, including limited integration into guidelines, gaps in external validation, and the "Oedipus effect," where probabilistic predictions influence patient behavior, treatment decisions, and research outcomes. Incorporating individualized, time-sensitive risk prediction into clinical frameworks may better align diagnostic definitions with patient needs, reduce overtreatment, and optimize both everyday care and research in epilepsy prevention and management.

Indexed as

EpilepsyPrecision MedicineSeizuresHumansPrognosisRecurrenceRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsacquired epilepsyCOSYindividualized predictionnumber needed to treatprognostic modelsseizure recurrence risk

Identifiers

PMID40824375
PMCPMC12779318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.