ArticleEnvironmental management2025
Barriers and Drivers of Using Alternative Fertilizers in Sustainable Agriculture: Case Study of Poland.
Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fertilizers are crucial for enhancing soil fertility and agricultural productivity, playing a pivotal role in modern farming practices. However, the reliance on mineral fertilizers has raised concerns due to their environmental impacts, including soil degradation, water contamination, and greenhouse gas emissions. Consequently, there is growing interest in sustainable alternatives that leverage organic waste streams to recycle nutrients back into agricultural systems. Alternative fertilizers produced from such as sewage sludge, animal manure and digestate, are increasingly recognized for their potential to support sustainable agriculture. This paper presents the goal of assessing the current state and development potential of alternative fertilizer use in Poland in the context of circular economy (CE). The SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) method was used to carry out the analysis. The key findings include identification of strengths such as the environmental benefits of nutrient recycling, reduced waste generation and cost savings for farmers. However, the analysis also indicates weaknesses, such as inconsistent quality, potential contamination risks and social resistance to using waste-derived products. Opportunities were identified, including increasing demand for eco-friendly agricultural practices, technological advancements in waste treatment and supportive policies that promote CE initiatives. Nevertheless, the sector faces threats such as regulatory barriers, competition with synthetic fertilizers and potential health risks from pollutants in organic waste streams. Considering the rising importance of social dimensions in sustainability assessment, a growing number of studies in the fertilizer sector is expected to adopt Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) to evaluate social impacts and acceptance of alternative fertilizers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.