Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824325›Full record

ArticleJournal of hematopathology2025

Application of capillary gel electrophoresis in detection of Factor VIII gene intron 22 inversion of hemophilia A.

Liyan Li, Wenlong Luo, Limin Huang, Qiang Li, Wangjie Jin, Qianni Liang, Xu Yang, Yihong Li, Kun Li, Yuming Liu and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hematopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Liyan LiInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Wenlong LuoInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Limin HuangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Lianhua Road No. 1120, Shenzhen, Futian District, China.
Qiang LiThe Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Wangjie JinTechnology Center of Prenatal Diagnosis and Genetic Diseases Diagnosis, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Qianni LiangThe Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510317, China.
Xu YangInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Yihong LiTechnology Center of Prenatal Diagnosis and Genetic Diseases Diagnosis, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Kun LiInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Yuming LiuInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Xuexi YangInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. yangxuexi2017@126.com.
Juanjuan ChenInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. chenjj0730@126.com.

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2022A1515110801Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Special Project of the President's Fund of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University 2021Y001Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Foundation A2024354Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project 2025A04J4085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intron 22 inversion (Inv22) of the factor VIII gene (F8) accounts for approximately 45% of severe hemophilia A (HA) cases. Detecting Inv22 has become the primary screening method for severe HA. Currently, agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) following long-distance polymerase chain reaction (LD-PCR) is commonly used in clinical settings to separate the amplified fragments of Inv22. However, AGE is hindered by lengthy processing times, instability, and inaccuracies in quantifying DNA content and assessing fragment sizes. We combined LD-PCR with capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE) for the identification of Inv22 in HA. Three primers were designed for LD-PCR to differentiate between Inv22, carriers, and wild types. We optimized the reaction system and conditions for CGE to effectively separate the amplified fragments. The optimal dilution ratio and buffer conditions for detecting Inv22 using CGE were 300 × and 0.1 × TE buffer. The ideal voltage and duration were 5.0 kV for 80 min. Under these conditions, the amplified fragments could be effectively separated, allowing for the direct measurement of concentration and size of the target fragments using ProSize data analysis software. The LD-PCR combined with the CGE assay for detecting Inv22 in F8 within HA populations has been successfully established. This method reduces both the time and labor required for detecting Inv22 in clinical practice, thereby advancing genetic diagnostic technology for hemophilia.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionFactor VIIIHemophilia AIntronsElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionF8 protein, humanFactor VIIICapillary gel electrophoresisFactor VIIIHemophilia AIntron 22 inversionLD-PCR

Identifiers

PMID40824325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.