Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824296›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2026

Prediction model for postoperative complications in gastrointestinal surgery based on preoperative and intraoperative factors using machine learning: a retrospective, single-center study.

Yuya Ashitomi, Ryosuke Takahashi, Shinji Okazaki, Shuichiro Sugawara, Yukinori Kamio, Hiroaki Musha, Fuyuhiko Motoi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuya AshitomiFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata City, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Ryosuke TakahashiFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata City, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Shinji OkazakiFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata City, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Shuichiro SugawaraFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata City, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Yukinori KamioFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata City, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Hiroaki MushaFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata City, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Fuyuhiko MotoiFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata City, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan. fmotoi@med.id.yamagata-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMachine learning (ML) is a method of creating models by learning latent patterns and features from collected data to predict and classify new unknown data. We constructed an ML model to predict postoperative complications using various pre- and intraoperative factors from electronic medical records and examined its prediction accuracy.

methodsData of 617 patients who underwent major organ resection were included in this study. Patient information was collected from the medical records. Consequently, we created Dataset 1, which included all of the data, and Dataset 2, which was adjusted for the factors. The ML models were applied to the two datasets, and the performances of the ML models were compared.

resultsIn Dataset 1, the Logistic Regression model showed the best performance, with correct predictions of serious postoperative complications (accuracy), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) values of 0.798, 0.671, and 0.374, respectively. The random forest (RF) model performed best in Dataset 2, with accuracy, AUROC, and AUPRC values of 0.855, 0.725, and 0.412, respectively.

conclusionsThe RF model performed well in predicting serious postoperative complications of gastrointestinal surgery. Further studies are required to improve the accuracy of this ML model for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntraoperative PeriodLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesROC CurveArea under the precision–recall curveGastrointestinal surgeryMachine learningPostoperative complicationsRandom forest model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.