ArticleSurgery today2026
Prediction model for postoperative complications in gastrointestinal surgery based on preoperative and intraoperative factors using machine learning: a retrospective, single-center study.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMachine learning (ML) is a method of creating models by learning latent patterns and features from collected data to predict and classify new unknown data. We constructed an ML model to predict postoperative complications using various pre- and intraoperative factors from electronic medical records and examined its prediction accuracy.
methodsData of 617 patients who underwent major organ resection were included in this study. Patient information was collected from the medical records. Consequently, we created Dataset 1, which included all of the data, and Dataset 2, which was adjusted for the factors. The ML models were applied to the two datasets, and the performances of the ML models were compared.
resultsIn Dataset 1, the Logistic Regression model showed the best performance, with correct predictions of serious postoperative complications (accuracy), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) values of 0.798, 0.671, and 0.374, respectively. The random forest (RF) model performed best in Dataset 2, with accuracy, AUROC, and AUPRC values of 0.855, 0.725, and 0.412, respectively.
conclusionsThe RF model performed well in predicting serious postoperative complications of gastrointestinal surgery. Further studies are required to improve the accuracy of this ML model for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40824296What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.