SynthesisDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2025
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous thermal ablation in Bosniak III and IV cystic renal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLocal thermal ablation is considered a standard treatment for small kidney masses. However, few studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of thermal ablation for cystic kidney masses.
methodsThe MEDLINE library, Cochrane, and SCOPUS databases were screened for studies investigating the efficacy of thermal ablation for cystic renal masses, comprising studies between 1995 and February 2024. In total, seven studies were deemed suitable and included in the present analysis.
resultsThe studies included a total of 113 participants with 134 cystic renal masses. The sample sizes ranged from 5 to 38 participants. There were 76 men (67.2%) and 37 women (32.8%), with a mean age of 64.7 years (range: 50 to 75.4 years). Overall, 55 cystic masses were classified as Bosniak III (41%) and 79 as Bosniak IV (59%). Technical success of local thermal ablation was reported in 133 cystic masses (99.2%). The pooled meta-analytic technical success rate was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 96%-100%, I
conclusionLocal thermal ablation can be considered a highly effective and safe procedure for cystic kidney masses. Most studies were performed using radiofrequency ablation, underscoring the need for further studies on alternative ablation techniques such as microwave ablation and cryoablation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Local thermal ablation is an effective and safe procedure for treating cystic kidney masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.