ArticlePsychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology2025
What Is the Level of Language Development of Children at Risk of Developmental Language Disorder 2 Years Later?
Article in Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study investigates the language development of children at risk for developmental language disorder (DLD) 2 years after initial assessment and evaluates the impact of parental training on language outcomes. Methods: Sixteen children (9 boys and 7 girls) who were at risk for DLD 2 years ago and whose parents were trained after the initial assessment were re-evaluated. During the study period, children's language development was evaluated using the Denver II Developmental Screening Test and the Turkish Adaptation of the Test of Early Language Development (TEDIL). Parents' perceptions of their children's language skills were also assessed. Results: At the second evaluation, 31.25% of the children were diagnosed with DLD, while 68.75% reached a normal language development level. TEDIL test results showed a significant increase in expressive and overall spoken language scores in children without DLD. Parents reported that their children's overall levels of communication, expression, and intelligibility increased significantly over 2 years. Conclusion: In this study, it was determined that some of the children at risk of DLD were diagnosed with DLD after 2 years. Long-term follow-ups of children at risk of DLD were also observed. Early parent training is beneficial in supporting language development in children at risk for DLD, emphasizing the importance of early intervention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.