ArticleFEMS yeast research2025
Reviving Élie Metschnikoff's Monospora: the obligately parasitic yeast Australozyma monospora sp. nov.
Article in FEMS yeast research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoplastic-induced microbiome shifts reduceISME communications · 2026Article
- Swimming behavior of Daphnia dentifera is influenced by Australozyma monospora infection.PloS one · 2026Article
- Candidozyma cisalpinoae sp. nov., a Genomically Distinct, Flower-Associated Yeast, Resistant to Azoles and Exhibiting Pathogenicity-Related Traits.Yeast (Chichester, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A vast literature explores a model system that consists of a prey crustacean, the water flea Daphnia spp., and an obligately pathogenic yeast that has been referred to as Metschnikowia bicuspidata and thought to represent the material used by Metschnikoff in his study of innate immunity. Typification of species bearing that name and indeed the whole genus has been problematic as regards yeasts that only grow or form aciculate ascospores in hospite. The neotype of M. bicuspidata, unlike the Daphnia parasite, is easily cultured on a variety of laboratory media, although it too can cause serious infections in a variety of mostly aquatic animals. It has become evident that the Daphnia parasite studied by Metschnikoff or current workers is not closely related to M. bicuspidata as currently understood. Analysis of whole genome DNA extracted from the yeast repeatedly found in infected Daphnia specimens shows that it belongs to the recently circumscribed genus Australozyma. The yeast is described here as Australozyma monospora sp. nov. The species, although haplontic and heterothallic, forms single-spored asci without mating. It also appears that all species in the genus are restricted to asexual reproduction, which may explain their rare status. The holotype is MICH 346683. The name is registered in Mycobank under the number MB 859667.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.