Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823975›Full record

GuidelineJornal brasileiro de nefrologia

Position statement of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology on the refusal and discontinuation of dialysis.

Dirceu Reis da Silva, Fernanda Salomão Gorayeb-Polacchini, Ana Flávia Moura, Cibele Isaac Saad Rodrigues, Maurício Younes-Ibrahim, Eduardo Rocha, Marina Aline Occhiena de Oliveira Neiva, Pedro Túlio Rocha, Patrícia Ferreira Abreu, José A Moura-Neto

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dirceu Reis da SilvaSociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7587-0604
Fernanda Salomão Gorayeb-PolacchiniSociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8803-1300
Ana Flávia MouraSociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7368-4704
Cibele Isaac Saad RodriguesSociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9490-7997
Maurício Younes-IbrahimSociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2521-764X
Eduardo RochaSociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6465-5207
Marina Aline Occhiena de Oliveira NeivaSociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9433-3483
Pedro Túlio RochaSociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0259-2647
Patrícia Ferreira AbreuSociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9860-4812
José A Moura-NetoSociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-3731

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal failure is considered a life-limiting CONDITION that often requires Renal Replacement Therapy, such as dialysis or kidney transplantation. Dialysis can effectively relieve symptoms and prolong life, but its withdrawal results in severe complications and death. The decision to discontinue or refuse to dialysis must be made collaboratively by the patient, family, and healthcare team, considering the clinical condition, life expectancy, symptom burden, and individual preferences. This decision, involving clinical, bioethical, and legal aspects, is complex and requires a collective understanding of the process. Withdrawal to dialysis presents a challenge for nephrologists and the healthcare team due to the lack of clear guidelines, which can compromis the safety of the process and the patient's dignity. In this position statement, the Brazilian Society of Nephrology recommends a process for dialysis withdrawal or refusal, including identifying eligible patients, applying prognostic assessment tools, shared decision-making, advance care planning, and offering dialysis alternatives. The decision must be consensual, allowing adequate time for reflection, and healthcare services must provide comprehensive management of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual symptoms, as well as end-of-life care. Proper documentation in medical records is essential to ensure process transparency. Therefore, refusal or withdrawal to dialysis should be an informed decision that respects individual autonomy and balances clinical, bioethical, spiritual, and legal considerations.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisTreatment RefusalWithholding TreatmentBrazilDecision Making, SharedHumansNephrologySocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID40823975
PMCPMC12360398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.