ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2025
Measuring Misophonia: Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the MisoQuest and Its Ability to Predict Cognitive Impacts of Triggering Sounds.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMisophonia is characterized by an aversion to specific sounds, such as chewing and breathing. These "trigger" sounds can elicit negative emotional reactions, physiological stress, and cognitive impairments in people with misophonia. Despite its impact, misophonia lacks formal diagnostic classification, largely due to challenges in conceptualization and assessment. One of the few psychometrically robust self-report measures for misophonia (the MisoQuest) was originally developed and evaluated in Polish. The current study evaluated the utility of the English language version of the MisoQuest, including assessment of its criterion validity using cognitive performance as an outcome.
methodsA total of 139 participants (44 people with misophonia and 95 controls) completed the MisoQuest, the Selective Sound Sensitivity Syndrome Scale (S-Five), the Generalized Anxiety Disorders Scale, and the Sensory Hypersensitivity Scale. Participants then completed either a Stroop task or reading comprehension task in the presence/absence of triggering sounds. A subset of participants retook the MisoQuest after 5 weeks.
resultsThe MisoQuest showed excellent internal consistency and strong test-retest reliability. Additionally, MisoQuest scores strongly correlated with S-Five scores, supporting convergent validity, and moderately correlated with measures of generalized anxiety and sensory hypersensitivity, indicating some overlap while supporting discriminant validity. Higher MisoQuest scores predicted poorer reading comprehension performance when trigger sounds were present, supporting criterion validity. However, MisoQuest scores showed no significant relationship with Stroop task performance.
conclusionThese findings support the MisoQuest as a reliable and useful measure of misophonia in English-speaking individuals and suggest its scores may relate to clinically relevant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.