ArticleDermatology reports2026
A bibliometric study of the top 100 most-cited articles on melanoma: insights into research trends and characteristics.
Article in Dermatology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Artificial Intelligence in melanoma research: a bibliometric analysis".International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Nivolumab-AVD versus Brentuximab Vedotin-AVD as First-Line Treatment for Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving insights into current research and literature on melanoma enables healthcare providers to offer patients better care by applying the latest advancements. This bibliometric study analyzed the characteristics and trends in melanoma research through the top-cited articles. The top 100 most-cited articles on melanoma were published between 1969 and 2020, and the average number of citations was 36.8-893.9 (mean 176.8). Notably, the frequencies of the main key words, including antineoplastic agents, genetics, randomized controlled trials, metastatic melanoma, BRAF, and monoclonal antibodies, during 2010-2020 were significantly higher than during 1969-2009. Specifically, the main study topics after 2010 were drug research aspects, such as drug safety, drug efficacy, drug resistance, drug withdrawal, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1), ipilimumab, nivolumab, trametinib, dabrafenib, vemurafenib, and various drug adverse effects. The emergence of immunotherapy caused a burst of citations and substantially changed the distribution of top-cited articles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.