Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823804›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025

Validated prediction of xerostomia in a real-world population: a step toward model-guided radiotherapy.

Emmy Dalqvist, Tiziana Rancati, Anna Embring, Gabriella Alexandersson von Döbeln, Ingmar Lax, Signe Friesland, Eva Onjukka

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emmy DalqvistDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine and Medical Physics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. emmy.dalqvist@ki.se.ORCID 0009-0002-3928-8008
Tiziana RancatiData Science Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7849-603X
Anna EmbringDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Radiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5147-3276
Gabriella Alexandersson von DöbelnDepartment of Radiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ingmar LaxDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Signe FrieslandDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8118-1066
Eva OnjukkaDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine and Medical Physics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe aim of this study is to validate an Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) model for xerostomia in a large quality-registry cohort, enabling its future use in individualized NTCP-based treatment planning. MATERIAL AND

methodsA model predicting grade ≥ 2 xerostomia (6 months post-radiotherapy) was selected for validation, including the mean dose to both the parotid and the submandibular glands, in addition to the baseline score for xerostomia, as predictors. Our local validation cohort consisted of 674 patients (204 events), treated between 2012 and 2024, with a median follow-up of 10.3 months (range 5-24). A closed testing procedure was performed to investigate the need for model updating, and the performance of the models was assessed with calibration curves, discrimination, the Brier score, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

resultsThe calibration curve demonstrated that the model predicted the dose-response relationship well. The validation cohort showed a slightly stronger dose response, with a slope of 1.16. The calibration intercept of -0.12 revealed an overestimation of xerostomia. However, the closed testing procedure indicated that a recalibration of the model was needed, and the HL-test showed a significant deviation. The recalibrated model showed perfect calibration but still limited discrimination (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.62).

conclusionThe validated model performed well in our real-life dataset despite the differences between the training and validation cohorts, particularly considering the lack of baseline score in our cohort. This highlights the potential for improved performance with baseline inclusion but still suggests that an individualized NTCP-based treatment-planning protocol can be developed using the recalibrated published model.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedXerostomiaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskParotid GlandRadiotherapy Dosage

Identifiers

PMID40823804
PMCPMC12371747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.