ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
Combined single- and dual-energy CT workflow for dose calculation in radiotherapy.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Photon-counting detector computing tomography in treatment planning of head-and-neck cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeDual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is increasingly used in radiotherapy delineation due to its enhanced soft tissue contrast. DECT also supports direct dose calculation. However, as most current DECT scanners allow for use in only certain body regions, conventional single-energy computed tomography (SECT) is still needed for some patients. A safe clinical introduction of DECT thus requires a combined workflow. This study therefore investigates whether a unified Hounsfield look-up table (HLUT) can be applied across SECT and DECT reconstructions. Patient/material and methods: A Gammex Advanced Electron Density phantom containing tissue-equivalent inserts was scanned using SECT (70-140 kVp and Sn100-Sn140 kVp, Sn meaning tin-filtered) and dual-spiral DECT to identify matching HLUTs for three SECT methods, including a standard reconstruction (only 120 kVp; Method 1), and kVp-independent reconstructions providing mass density (MD; Method 2) or relative electron density (RED; Method 3). Dose agreement was subsequently tested on two anthropomorphic phantoms. For each SECT method, DECT reconstructions were compared through voxel-wise analysis of computed tomography (CT) numbers, and by performing dose calculations in three anatomical regions: head, thorax, and abdomen/pelvis.
resultsAcross all three SECT methods, DECT reconstructions with acceptable clinical CT number agreement were identified. Corresponding dose calculations between SECT- and DECT-based plans showed minimal differences.
interpretationThis phantom study demonstrates that a unified HLUT can be applied across SECT and DECT using standard 120 kVp, MD, or RED reconstructions. This approach may streamline clinical workflows and support a safe and practical transition to DECT-based treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.