ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2025
Percutaneous radial access is safe and effective for subclavian branch treatment during zone 2 endovascular aortic repair with thoracic branch endoprosthesis.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transradial left subclavian branch cannulation during thoracic branched endovascular repair: Feasibility and early to midterm outcomes from a single center.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The thoracic branch endoprosthesis (TBE, W. L. Gore & Associates) provides an off-the-shelf endovascular solution for zone 2 aortic pathology that maintains perfusion to the arm. This study evaluates safety and efficacy of percutaneous radial access for subclavian branch treatment during TBE repair. A single-institution retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent zone 2 aortic repair with TBE between 2022 and 2024 was performed. Treatment indications included acute complicated aortic dissection, aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration, penetrating aortic ulcer, blunt thoracic aortic injury, and de novo aneurysmal disease. Sixty-three consecutive patients (66.7% male; mean age, 61.0 ± 16.5 years) underwent zone 2 repair with a TBE device, 29 (46.0%) for aneurysmal disease, 15 (23.8%) for blunt thoracic aortic injury, 17 (27.0%) for dissection, and 2 (3.2%) for penetrating aortic ulcer. Twenty-one (33.3%) were urgent or emergent cases performed within 24 hours of presentation. Side branch treatment was performed through percutaneous left radial access in 60 patients (95.2%). Radial access was technically successful in 100% of attempts without the need for more proximal percutaneous or open upper extremity access. One (1.7%) asymptomatic radial artery occlusion was detected postoperatively, and did not require intervention. Postoperative imaging was obtained before discharge in 58 patients (92.1%), demonstrating 100% subclavian side branch patency. These results demonstrate that left radial access is safe and effective for subclavian branch treatment during thoracic branch endoprosthesis for management of zone 2 aortic pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.