ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Jumping Dot Sign: A New Radiological Sign Predicting Inferior Clinical Outcome and Higher Cyst Recurrence Following Bone Marrow Stimulation for Cystic Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) is the most commonly performed surgery for osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT), but there is a risk of poor outcome when cysts recur. The indications of BMS in the presence of cystic OLT remain controversial. Purpose: To investigate whether a new "jumping dot (JD) sign," manifesting as speckle-like areas of elevated signals surrounding the subchondral bone cyst (SBC) on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against the background of bone marrow edema (BME), could be a predictor of clinical outcome and recurrence of SBCs following BMS and to further propose a more precise indication regarding BMS surgery for cystic OLT. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with cystic OLTs (<150 mm Results: A total of 117 patients were divided into the JD sign group (n = 41) and no JD sign group (n = 76), and no significant difference was found for the follow-up duration (48.04 ± 14.78 months vs 48.46 ± 15.38 months; Conclusion: The JD sign might be significantly associated with inferior clinical outcomes and higher SBC recurrence following BMS for cystic OLT. For those patients with the maximal vertical diameter of the cyst >5.4 mm and with JD signs, BMS may not be an appropriate option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.