ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Development and validation of the machine learning model for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prediction based on inflammatory biomarkers.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation between urea-to-creatinine ratio and poor prognosis of intensive care unit patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a study based on the MIMIC-IV database.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of a clinical prediction model for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Prediction of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Machine Learning, Clinical Summary Notes, and Vital Signs: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in the United States.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a prediction model for 90-day readmission in elderly patients with COPD complicated by pulmonary heart disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating Machine Learning for Early COPD Prediction in Lung Cancer Patients: A Focus on Systemic Coagulation-Inflammation Index.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Development and explainability of a machine learning prediction model for histological prostatic inflammation in surgically treated patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-center internal validation study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for 90-Day Readmission in Hospitalized Older Patients with AECOPD: A Two-Center Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Deconvolution of molecular mechanisms in di-n-butyl phthalate/mono-n-butyl phthalate induced diabetic kidney disease by integrated machine learning and molecular docking.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Low levels of serum albumin and blood basophils as 10-year mortality predictors in a nationwide Korean COPD cohort.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is a major cause of hospitalization and mortality in COPD patients. Current prediction methods rely primarily on clinical symptoms and physician experience, lacking objective and precise tools. This study aimed to integrate multiple inflammatory biomarkers to develop and compare machine learning models for predicting AECOPD, providing evidence for early intervention. Methods: This retrospective study included 763 COPD patients (443 AECOPD, 320 stable COPD), randomly divided into training ( Results: The GBM model demonstrated superior performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.900 (95%CI: 0.858-0.942), accuracy of 0.948, specificity of 0.952, and sensitivity of 0.944 in the validation cohort, significantly outperforming the traditional LR model (AUC = 0.870). SHAP analysis identified MLR (mean SHAP value = 0.5), NLR (0.35), and pulmonary heart disease (0.32) as the three most important predictive factors. AECOPD risk increased significantly with rising MLR and NLR values, while ELR showed a negative correlation with AECOPD risk. Decision curve analysis confirmed that the GBM model provided the highest net benefit within clinically relevant threshold ranges (0.2-0.8). Conclusion: The GBM model integrating multiple inflammatory indices effectively predicts AECOPD. Based on routine blood test indicators without requiring expensive additional tests, this model is particularly suitable for resource-limited primary healthcare settings, providing a precise tool for early identification and individualized treatment of AECOPD, potentially improving prognosis and quality of life for COPD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.