ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
The effect of implementation leadership training for nursing informal leaders in the evidence-based practice.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implementation leadership is important for the successful implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP). Informal leaders, who are important promoters of EBP in nursing in the current healthcare system, can affect nursing management, organizational effectiveness, and cultural quality positively. However, informal leaders may lack training in leadership management and EBP. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the training program for implementation leadership, aiming to improve the leadership of informal leaders in EBP. Methods: Based on the Ottawa Model, this study designed a training program for implementation leadership, which lasted for 4 months and had 60 class hours. Seventy-five nursing informal leaders were trained in three steps of "Theoretical Training-Interactive Workshop-Theme Report". Before the first training and after the last training, we evaluated the training effectiveness using Kirkpatrick's evaluation model at the four levels of reaction (training satisfaction survey), learning (Evidence-Based Practice Belief Scale), behavior (Evidence-Based Nursing Competence Scale), and result (Implementation Leadership Scale). Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, and paired t-tests for effect sizes. Results: At the reaction level, the informal leaders had 100% engagement and high satisfaction score. At the learning level, the score of the Evidence-Based Practice Belief Scale of informal leaders after training [(69.24 ± 5.32)] vs. [(59.91 ± 5.96)] was significantly higher than that before training ( Conclusion: The training program is a highly accepted, practical, and effective implementation strategy for informal leaders, which can improve the evidence-based nursing belief, evidence-based nursing competence, and implementation leadership of nursing informal leaders, and has a positive impact on EBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.