ArticleCureus2025
Effectiveness of Sliding Mechanics on a Hybrid Round-Rectangular Archwire for Maxillary Canine Retraction, Angulation Control, Root Resorption, Pain, and Patient Satisfaction in Adult Class II Division 1 Patients: A Preliminary Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the efficacy of sliding mechanisms on round versus rectangular archwires in canine retraction after first premolar extraction in class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Trial
- Efficiency and biomechanics of a novel CAD/CAM individual distalizer versus cervical headgear: a preliminary prospective cohort study and exploratory finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Impact of Platelet-Rich Plasma on the Rate of Canine Retraction: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.Cureus · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of digital straightwire lingual versus labial fixed appliances assessed with American Board of Orthodontics indices: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveOptimizing orthodontic tooth movement while minimizing complications remains a primary goal for both clinicians and patients. This preliminary study evaluated canine retraction using the sliding technique on a round cross-section archwire, employing a hybrid archwire designed to enhance movement efficiency while controlling canine angulation during retraction. This hybrid design combines a rectangular anterior segment for incisor control with a round posterior segment to reduce friction during canine retraction, differing from conventional single-section wires.
methodsThis study was conducted at the University of Damascus from October 2022 to May 2023 with six patients diagnosed with Class II, Division I malocclusion (mean age: 21.18 ± 2.16 years). After premolar extractions, evaluation focused on the retraction of the right and left canines. A custom hybrid archwire was used, featuring a 0.021 × 0.025-inch rectangular section for the incisor brackets and a 0.020-inch round section for the canine, premolar brackets, and molar tubes. The study assessed the rate of retraction, angulation changes, root resorption, and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) until a Class I relationship was achieved. Model casts were digitally scanned and analyzed in 3D using Blender® 4.4 to quantify movement, standard lateral cephalometric images (T1 and T2) were obtained to assess angulation changes, panoramic radiographs (T1 and T2) were used to evaluate root resorption, and questionnaires using VAS were administered for PROMs.
resultsThe overall mean retraction rate was 1.28 ± 0.13 mm/month. The mean canine retraction rates were 1.46 ± 0.13, 1.42 ± 0.16, and 1.43 ± 0.16 mm/month in the first, second, and third months, respectively. The average retraction time was 4.38 ± 0.75 months, the mean canine angulation change was 5.05 ± 2.03 degrees, the mean canine root resorption was 1.01 ± 0.44 mm, and patient satisfaction was high, with an average score of 93.67.
conclusionSliding on a 0.020-inch round cross-section archwire can significantly increase the retraction speed of the upper canines while minimizing changes in canine angulation during retraction, with minimal resorption and high satisfaction. However, further validation is needed to confirm its clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.