ArticleCureus2025
GAP-CP: Gender, Age, and Presentation in Chest Pain.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chest pain is a common symptom with significant diagnostic challenges, particularly as its presentation and associated outcomes can vary by sex and age. This retrospective cohort study examined 10,220 patients referred to a UK Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic between 2018 and 2024 to explore differences in presentation, investigation pathways and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity. Patients were categorised by sex, age group and chest pain type (typical, atypical or non-cardiac), and the type of investigation or management they received was assessed. Men were more likely to report typical chest pain and undergo invasive angiography, while women more often presented atypically and were managed with non-invasive imaging. In patients with typical chest pain, men were significantly more likely to have severe CAD on angiography, especially in older age groups. These findings support risk-based models that incorporate sex and age, such as the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood approach, rather than a one-size-fits-all computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA)-first pathway recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The study highlights the importance of using sex- and age-specific strategies in the triage of chest pain to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce delays, and ensure timely identification of patients at highest risk of significant coronary disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.