ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2023
Interrogating perceived relevance and feasibility of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: A novel model of PrEP acceptability among cisgender women who inject drugs.
Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Uptake of daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains low among cisgender women who inject drugs (WWID) in the U.S., who experience elevated sexual- and injection-mediated HIV exposure risks. While anticipated barriers to PrEP uptake have been explored, further work is needed to situate PrEP acceptability (i.e., PrEP interest and willingness) within the context of WWID's lives and the HIV risk environment. Methods: We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews (N = 27) with cisgender WWID in Baltimore, Maryland, between April-September 2021. Interviews explored women's daily survival needs, substance use practices, healthcare experiences, HIV risk perception, and PrEP perspectives. Thematic analysis revealed complex dimensions of WWID's health perspectives and HIV risk conceptualization, from which a Psychosocial Model of PrEP Acceptability and a novel construct of 'perceived PrEP relevance' were developed using a grounded theory approach. Results: In our Psychosocial Model of PrEP Acceptability, anticipated PrEP feasibility and perceived PrEP relevance shape women's interest in and willingness to initiate PrEP. Attending to PrEP-related healthcare tasks (e. g., medical appointments, bloodwork) and managing a daily medication regimen were anticipated as feasible but would likely be de-prioritized relative to women's competing substance-related and survival needs. Women's perceptions of both their locus of HIV risk and sufficiency of existing HIV prevention practices determined their perceived PrEP relevance. PrEP was least relevant for women perceiving their prevention practices as sufficient to mitigate self-controlled HIV risk and most relevant for women perceiving their prevention practices as insufficient to mitigate environmentally shaped HIV risk. Conclusions: Our models demonstrate how PrEP acceptability is influenced by WWID's lived experiences and complex risk conceptualization. Effective multilevel interventions to enhance PrEP engagement should support women's competing needs, affirm women's existing prevention strategies, and address the harms of the HIV risk environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.