Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823413›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The leverage role of feedback framing in promoting the spillover effect of idle item recycling.

Tingting Guo, Jinlei Zhu, Zhengxiang Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tingting GuoCollege of Business Administration, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, Liaoning, China.
Jinlei ZhuCollege of Business Administration, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, Liaoning, China.
Zhengxiang WuCollege of Business Administration, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the growing concerns over resource wastage and environmental pollution caused by improper disposal of idle items, information interventions have been implemented to encourage consumers to recycle these items. While such interventions primarily aim to promote idle item recycling, they may also trigger spillover effects either enhancing (positive spillover) or diminishing (negative spillover) additional environmental or non-environmental virtuous behaviors. This research investigates the impact of feedback framing on the spillover effects of consumers' idle item recycling behavior through three scenario experiments. The results demonstrated that compared with highlighting the positive outcomes or benefits (positive framing), feedback information focused on preventing negative consequences or costs (negative framing) would strengthen the positive spillover of consumers' idle item recycling behavior. And spillover effects are more likely to occur from idle item recycling to other low-cost pro-environmental behaviors. Furthermore, negative framing enhances consumers' perceived impact and pride regarding their recycling actions, which subsequently amplifies the spillover effect. However, this effect is contingent on the level of goal progress; negative framing is effective only when goal progress is low, not when it is high. This study advances the theoretical understanding of feedback framing's role in behavioral spillovers and offers practical insights for organizations and enterprises as they attempt to effectively intervene in consumers' idle item recycling behavior.

Indexed as

feedback framinggoal progressidle item recyclingperceived impactpridespillover effect

Identifiers

PMID40823413
PMCPMC12355520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.