Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823401›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Resistance or compliance? The impact of algorithmic awareness on people's attitudes toward online information browsing.

Ying Yuan, Yin Shi, Ti Su, HanXuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying YuanSchool of Journalism and Communication, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yin ShiFaculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Ti SuCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
HanXuan ZhangSchool of Journalism, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With the pervasive integration of big data algorithms into daily life, individuals increasingly rely on algorithmic filtering to access information of interest, yet simultaneously face the risk of confinement within "information cocoons." This study examines how algorithmic awareness influences people's attitudes toward online information browsing. Methods: Using a 2 × 2 mixed design (algorithmic awareness × browsing purpose), this study reveals the mediating roles of perceived power and internal control. Participants performed simulated information-seeking tasks where all content was randomly presented (eliminating actual algorithmic bias). Mediating roles of perceived power and internal control were analyzed using PROCESS macro. Results: Algorithmic awareness significantly increases people's compliance, especially when they browse online information with a certain purpose, despite all information in the experiment being presented randomly. Algorithmic awareness increases people's sense of power and internal control over information, which, in turn, increases algorithmic compliance behavior. Discussion: Results reveal that algorithmic awareness reshapes user behavior through psychological empowerment, even in algorithm-neutral environments. By studying the influencing factors of mobile new media users' compliance and resistance to algorithms, this study is helpful in assisting users to eliminate their state of technological unconsciousness and achieve good algorithmic use.

Indexed as

algorithmic consciousnesscomplianceinternal controlperceived powerresistance

Identifiers

PMID40823401
PMCPMC12354539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.