ReviewCurrent pediatrics reports2024
The Impact of Norovirus on Children and Adolescents: Implications for Ongoing Vaccine Development.
Review in Current pediatrics reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global trends in norovirus genotype distribution among medically attended children with acute gastroenteritis, 2020-2025.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2026Article
- The Largest Outbreak of Acute Gastroenteritis of Mixed Norovirus Genogroups in the Coast of São Paulo State, Brazil.Viruses · 2026Article
- Antiviral strategies against human norovirus: Molecular targets, therapeutics, and vaccine development.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: This article highlights the heightened vulnerability of children and adolescents to norovirus infection and discusses the implications for ongoing vaccine development efforts. Recent Findings: Young children remain highly vulnerable to norovirus infections and are at an increased risk of severe disease. However, a recent Phase 2b clinical trial in infants failed to demonstrate meaningful protection or other clinical benefits. Similarly, low protective efficacy was observed in adults in a separate Phase 2b clinical evaluation, raising concerns about the complexity of norovirus vaccine development, particularly for young children. Summary: Norovirus continues to pose a significant global health threat, affecting individuals of all ages and contributing to considerable morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic burden. Children and adolescents are especially vulnerable, as they often spend time in closed or semi-closed environments such as daycare centers and schools, settings commonly associated with norovirus outbreaks. The lack of an FDA-approved norovirus vaccine underscores the urgent need for effective preventive strategies. Several vaccine candidates, utilizing diverse platforms, have advanced to Phase 2 clinical trials and beyond, targeting various age groups. While some have shown promise in adults, a recent Phase 2b clinical trial of a VLP-based vaccine in infants failed to demonstrate sufficient efficacy, and another Phase 2b study of an adenovirus-vectored vaccine reported low efficacy in adults. These findings suggest that novel approaches and strategies may be required to overcome the current challenges in norovirus vaccine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.