Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823377›Full record

ArticleGerms2025

Bibliometric analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza research globally from 2003 to 2023.

Clement Meseko, Uwem Okon Edet, Okoroiwu Henshaw, Nicodemus Mkpuma, Kayode Abraham Olawuyi, Charles Archibong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Germs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. First Comprehensive Global Bibliometric Analysis of Monkeypox Virus Research Landscape From 1976 to 2025.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clement MesekoPhD, DVM, Regional Laboratory for Animal Influenza & Transboundary Animal Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI), Vom 930101, Plateau State, Nigeria.
Uwem Okon EdetPhD, Regional Laboratory for Animal Influenza & Transboundary Animal Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI), Vom 930101, Plateau State, Nigeria and Department of Biological Science (Microbiology Unit), Arthur Jarvis University, Dan Archibong Drive, Akpabuyo, Cross River State, Nigeria.
Okoroiwu HenshawPhD, Medical Laboratory Science Department, David Umahi Federal University of Health Sciences, Uburu, Ohaozara LGA, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.
Nicodemus MkpumaPhD, Regional Laboratory for Animal Influenza & Transboundary Animal Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI), Vom 930101, Plateau State, Nigeria.
Kayode Abraham OlawuyiPhD, Regional Laboratory for Animal Influenza & Transboundary Animal Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI), Vom 930101, Plateau State, Nigeria.
Charles ArchibongMSc, Department of Biological Science (Microbiology Unit), Arthur Jarvis University, Dan Archibong Drive, Akpabuyo, Cross River State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite decades of research on highly pathogenic avian influenza, especially H5N1, an understanding of the impact of research outputs on policy, the impact of funding and policies, collaboration between authors, and other bibliometric measurable indices is elusive. Methods: H5N1 research data were retrieved from the PubMed database using "H5N1", "highly pathogenic", and "influenza" as keywords, and combined with the Boolean operator, "OR". The evaluated growth pattern of H5N1 research was analysed using Microsoft Excel, while the VOS viewer window version 1.6.15 was utilized in analyzing the keywords, authors' inputs, and collaborations amongst research institutes/universities involved in H5N1 research. Results: A total of 8,411 articles published within 2003 and 2023 were retrieved. The trend of the published articles indicates that 2003 to 2004 had the lowest number of articles, while the highest were observed for 2009 and 2010. Since then, there has been a gradual decline. The most dominant article type was original research article (89.80%), followed by reviews with 7.54%. The most productive countries were Japan, the United States of America, China, and Egypt in Africa. The top 15 authors accounted for 12.40% of the total published data. Keywords analysis revealed the emergence of newer keywords such as H5N8, wild birds, mammals, and Nigeria; however, as expected, influenza virus avian H5N1 subtype was the dominant keyword. Research institutes with backgrounds in agriculture and veterinary medicine dominated the top 15 organizations involved in H5N1 research. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that research aimed at developing therapeutics and vaccines, as well as continuous surveillance in high-risk areas is urgently needed. Furthermore, the findings provide baseline data for all the stakeholders involved in H5N1 research, which could inform future research, funding, and policies.

Indexed as

evolutionH5N1highly pathogenic avian influenzapoliciesresearch output

Identifiers

PMID40823377
PMCPMC12356348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.