Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823327›Full record

ArticlePsychology in Russia : state of the art2024

Psychometric Analysis of the Spanish Version of the

Fernanda Cordero-Hermida, Juan Diego Sacoto, Evelyn Sinchi, Paúl Arias-Medina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology in Russia : state of the art, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fernanda Cordero-HermidaUniversity of Cuenca, Ecuador.
Juan Diego SacotoIntegral Psychopedagogy Center "Jade", Cuenca, Ecuador.
Evelyn SinchiIntegral Psychopedagogy Center "Jade", Cuenca, Ecuador.
Paúl Arias-MedinaUniversity of Cuenca, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emerging adulthood is a newly known developmental stage in humans, between late adolescence and fully-achieved adulthood. This stage is characterized by continued indecision and postponement of individuation; it also corresponds with a delay in identity actualization. Personal identity is related to the development of the individual across various aspects of life including the identification of long-term goals, career selection, friendship, and sexuality. Therefore, identity is understood to be an individual's perception of themselves and the conceptualization of their place within a social context. Identity development is expected to reach this critical stage between late adolescence and emerging adulthood, where specific factors may arise to hinder the realization of identity, potentially resulting in identity problems or identity distress. The latter considered a disorder within the DSM-III, and based on its diagnostic criteria, the Objective: First, to report evidence of validity and reliability of the IDS using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, and invariance testing according to the Identity Distress Scale across a sample of Ecuadorian emerging adults. Second, to report the scores of the Identity Distress Scale among the participants. Design: The study employed a quantitative approach with a non-experimental, cross-sectional design, and an instrumental scope. Results: The results reveal that the scale operates with a first-order two-factor model, demonstrating a good fit and internal consistency (χ Conclusion: The IDS has adequate psychometric properties for its use in the Ecuadorian context.

Indexed as

confirmatory factor analysisconstruct validityemerging adulthoodexploratory factor analysisidentityidentity distress

Identifiers

PMID40823327
PMCPMC12352353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.