ArticleBrain, behavior, & immunity - health2025
Impact of sanitary conditions and dietary amino acids on behaviour and brain monoamine levels in piglets.
Article in Brain, behavior, & immunity - health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune activation due to poor hygienic conditions may affect behaviour, as the immune system and brain are linked through several mechanisms. This putative effect may partly result from increased amino acid (AA) metabolism, affecting brain monoamine levels. As pigs can select a diet that meets their AA requirements, offering them the choice between an AA deficient and AA enriched diet may influence the effects of sanitary conditions on brain neurochemistry and behaviour. Methods: We investigated the behavioural and neurochemical effects of high (HSC) vs. low (LSC) sanitary conditions on pigs with or without a choice to select between two diets differing in AA concentration in a 2x2 factorial experiment. Female pair-housed piglets (n = 48) were kept under HSC or LSC and were offered either a diet deficient in eight indispensable AA or the choice between the deficient diet and a diet enriched with these AA for 19 days. Behaviour, salivary cortisol, blood tryptophan (Trp) and serotonin (5-HT), and hippocampal/prefrontal concentrations of Trp, related monoamines and their metabolites were analysed. Results: LSC had lower platelet serotonin and plasma Trp than HSC piglets. Hippocampal and prefrontal cortex concentrations of Trp, kynurenine (KYN), kynurenic acid, epinephrine, norepinephrine, 5-HT, dopamine (DA), 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid and homovanillic acid (HVA) were lower for LSC than HSC piglets. LSC piglets had lower KYN/Trp ratios in the hippocampus and, if without dietary choice, in the prefrontal cortex. LSC piglets showed less play behaviours. Piglets without a dietary choice had lower plasma Trp, higher hippocampal HVA/DA turnover, and spent more time on damaging behaviours. No effects on salivary cortisol were found. Conclusions: A decline in health status induced by poor hygienic conditions reduced platelet 5-HT, blood and brain Trp, as well as brain neurotransmitter concentrations, and negatively influenced behaviour of pigs. There was no impact of offering a choice of an AA-enriched or AA-deficient diet on these effects of sanitary conditions, possibly due to low intake of the AA-enriched diet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.