ArticleBlood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis2025
Risk factors for joint bleeding in severe hemophilia A and B: analysis of the Community Counts longitudinal surveillance cohort.
Article in Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Joint Damage Prediction in Non-Severe Hemophilia A with Artificial Intelligence.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Joint bleeding is the primary determinant of end-stage arthropathy in hemophilia; joint bleeding has greatly decreased with the use of prophylaxis and introduction of highly effective therapies. This study aimed to determine current risk factors for joint bleeding in persons with severe hemophilia A or B. Demographic, treatment, and bleeding outcome data from Community Counts, a US national surveillance project, were analyzed. Data were collected at annual visits between 2013 and 2022. Eligibility included factor VIII or IX of <1%, no inhibitor, age of 2 to 44 years, and on treatment with continuous prophylaxis. Annual joint bleeding rate (AJBR) differences across demographic and clinical subgroups were compared via rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals, and with multivariate methods accounting for multiple measurements over time. The analysis included 2527 males with hemophilia, 7211 observation years, and 10 046 joint bleeds. Lower AJBR in hemophilia A was most strongly associated with use of emicizumab. For both hemophilia A and B, patient-associated factors, younger age, fewer missed doses, and full employment were all independently associated with lower AJBR, as was treatment in the Northeast of the United States. The findings of this comprehensive analysis of a large, diverse sample drawn from hemophilia treatment centers across the United States, underscore the important contributions of patient, community, and treatment factors on joint outcomes in severe hemophilia. Use of emicizumab and few missed doses independently predicted low AJBR, highlighting the interplay of access and adherence to care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.