ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Assessing MRI interpretability of the orbit, paranasal sinuses, and nasopharynx in cochlear implant patients.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary: Assessing MRI interpretability of the orbit, paranasal sinuses, and nasopharynx in cochlear implant patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Due to a growing focus on cost-effectiveness in healthcare, safety concerns with CI and the known limitations in image quality, there is an increasing need for well-considered indications before performing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in CI (cochlear implant) patients. This study aims to evaluate, for the first time, the clinical utility and limitations of MRI in CI patients for orbital, paranasal, and nasopharyngeal assessments. Materials and methods: CIs were positioned and fixed with bandaging around the head of a test subject at varying angular positions (90°, 120°, and 135°), both unilaterally and bilaterally, with and without the magnet in place. MRI acquisitions included T1-MP-RAGE, T2-TSE, T1-TIRM, and DWI sequences of a 3 Tesla MRI scanner. The MRI images were reconstructed three-dimensionally, and the resulting artifacts were analyzed to determine the interpretability of the predefined orbital, paranasal, and nasopharyngeal structures. Results: Image quality was categorized into four levels of restriction. It was observed that orbital MRI diagnostics in the required sequences (T1, T2, and DWI) are feasible even in patients with bilateral CIs with magnets Conclusion: This study offers insights into the predictive factors influencing the interpretability of MRI scans for the orbit, paranasal sinuses, and nasopharynx in CI patients. In particular, for the sphenoid sinus and nasopharynx, it is strongly advised to consult the responsible CI center before undergoing an MRI examination. This consultation helps assess the necessity of the MRI and, if required, consider the removal of the implant magnet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.