ArticleRural mental health2025
Social Well-Being among Rural County Fair Attendees: Results from a Pilot Study.
Article in Rural mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper reports on results from a pilot study to assess the feasibility of surveying rural county fair attendees about their social well-being. We collected survey data from attendees at two Midwestern rural county fairs in the summer of 2022 (n=56). The survey included questions on loneliness, social isolation, and social engagement, as well as demographic and health characteristics. We analyzed overall rates of social well-being, as well as differences by age, among respondents from rural areas. Respondents scored 4.8 (out of 9.0) on the UCLA Loneliness Scale, below the threshold for being classified as lonely. Respondents scored 17.2 (out of 30.0) on the Lubben Social Network Scale and identified various forms of social support. The highest rates of loneliness and smallest social networks were observed among younger adults (ages 18-34; n=12), while the best social well-being was among older adults (age 65+; n=9). The most common place for respondents to socialize was a restaurant/coffee shop (60% weekly or more often), followed by private homes (31-38% weekly or more often across own or others' homes). Respondents indicated a variety of barriers to social engagement, such as work schedules for younger adults and transportation for older adults. This survey instrument was successful at illuminating various dimensions of social well-being and engagement among rural residents. The social health of younger adults in rural areas needs more attention, including addressing barriers related to work schedules and financial resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.