ArticleOrthopedic reviews2025
Platelet Rich Plasma for the Therapy of the Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome: A Prospective Study About CT-Guided Facet Joint Injections With PRP Compared to Local Anesthetics.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Quality Assessment of Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education on Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Therapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Platelet-Rich Plasma Facet Joint Injections for Post-Traumatic Lumbar Facet-Mediated Pain: A Two-Patient Case Report.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of Leukocyte-poor-Platelet-Rich-Plasma (LpPRP) injections to treat chronic facet joint syndrome. Methods: 78 patients suffering from chronic facet joint syndrome at the Center for Molecular Orthopedics (CMO) agreed to participate to this prospective controlled study to receiving a series of CT-guided PAT-injections (periarticular therapy) to lumbar facet joints. The patients were free to decide to receive either injections based on Platelet-Rich-Plasma (PRP) or local anesthetics (LA/bupivacaine). In this study leucocyte-poor PRP (LpPRP) was used for all patients of the verum group, namely autologous conditioned plasma (Arthrex ACP® / Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA) as the verum group. 59 patients were treated 3-5 times in at least two levels of facet joints in the PRP group, 19 patients decided to join the LA group receiving local anesthetics (LA group) each in a weekly interval. All patients agreed to answer an automated email questionnaire for up to one year starting at baseline before receiving the first injections. The follow up protocol was based on a pain scale, and the Oswestry disability score. Data analysis was evaluated using the Excel analysis tools. Results: Data analysis revealed that both, PRP and local anesthetics had a pain reducing effect initially at week 2 after receiving the first PAT, but from week six on up to one year post injection, PRP infiltrations were superior with a significantly reduced pain score compared to baseline up to one year (p<0.001). Oswestry score showed similar results with a significant improvement to about one half compared to baseline (p<0.001) up to six months, still being significantly better at one year (p<0.01). The comparison of the PRP group to the LA group showed a better pain relief and better values at the Oswestry disability score between three and six months and one year. Conclusions: We show that a CT-guided injection therapy (PAT) based on LpPRP addressing the facet joint mediated low back pain syndrome leads to a significant long term pain reduction, and to a significant improvement in the Oswestry disability score for at least one year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.