Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823277›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2025

Noise Exposure in the Orthopedic Operating Room: A Scoping Review of Instrument-Related Noise Levels.

Mitchel Hawley, Anne Boeckmann, Lachlan Anderson, David Shau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mitchel HawleyAnne Burnett Marion School of Medicine Texas Christian University.
Anne BoeckmannAnne Burnett Marion School of Medicine Texas Christian University.
Lachlan AndersonAnne Burnett Marion School of Medicine Texas Christian University.
David ShauAnne Burnett Marion School of Medicine Texas Christian University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Noise exposure in orthopedic operating rooms (ORs), particularly from power tools, poses potential risks to surgical staff and patients, including noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). This scoping review quantifies noise exposure related to orthopedic instrument use and explores recommended guidelines. Methods: Using Covidence, PubMed was systematically searched for studies published between January 1990 and December 2023. Of 1671 initial studies, 13 met inclusion criteria. Data extracted included decibel measurements, instrument types, measurement distances, and noise exposure recommendations. Results: Unweighted decibel measurements for oscillating and reciprocating saws ranged from 81 dB to 131 dB, drilling systems from 78.3 dB to 97 dB, and hammering from 92 dB to 103.4 dB. A-weighted measurements for saws ranged from 53 dB(A) to 100 dB(A), drilling systems from 74.6 dB(A) to 97 dB(A), rasping systems from 87 dB(A) to 110 dB(A), and acetabular reaming at 87 dB(A). Action value set by the UK Control of Noise at Work Regulations, begin at 80 dB(A), requiring information, training, and hearing protection, while the upper exposure action value is 85 dB(A), mandating noise reduction measures and enforce hearing protection use. Of the included studies, 61.5% (8 of 13) provided explicit noise mitigation recommendations, 23.1% (3 of 13) presented mixed recommendations, and 15.4% (2 of 13) found no significant risk. Conclusion: Significant variation exists in reported exposure levels and recommendations, highlighting the need for standardized evaluation methodologies. Future research should focus on standardizing measurement parameters and comprehensively evaluating current instrumentation to develop evidence-based noise mitigation protocols for orthopedic ORs.

Indexed as

Instrument NoiseOrthopedic Noise ExposureOrthopedic Surgery

Identifiers

PMID40823277
PMCPMC12352336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.