ArticleOrthopedic reviews2025
Evaluating Bilateral Symptom Relief Following Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection Approaches: A Practical Overview for Trainees.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Practice Patterns of Physicians Who Perform Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections: A Technical Survey.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESIs) using a parasagittal approach are frequently employed to manage lumbar radicular pain. The degree of contralateral symptom relief achieved with parasagittal ILESIs remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the short-term effectiveness of parasagittal ILESIs in providing ipsilateral and contralateral symptom relief in patients with bilateral lumbar radiculopathy and unilateral contrast spread. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 12 patients with bilateral lumbar radicular symptoms who underwent parasagittal ILESIs under fluoroscopic guidance. Patient-reported symptom relief was assessed for both ipsilateral and contralateral sides at a two-week follow-up visit or phone call. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate patterns in symptom relief across the cohort. Results: All patients experienced significant relief on the ipsilateral side, with reported improvement ranging from 60% to 100% (mean: 84.6%). Contralateral relief was more variable, ranging from 0% to 90% (mean: 37.5%). No complications were reported. Conclusion: Parasagittal ILESIs provide more consistent and substantial relief of ipsilateral lumbar radicular symptoms. Contralateral relief is less predictable and may be limited by needle placement and the spread of medication. These findings support the use of parasagittal ILESIs in cases of unilateral or dominant-side radicular pain. For patients with significant bilateral symptoms, midline ILESIs or bilateral transforaminal injections may be more effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to identify predictors of bilateral relief and optimize procedural technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.