Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823242›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

A geo-additive spatial analysis of condom use among women aged 15-49 in Rwanda.

Mkhombiseni Zamani Sithole, Jesca Mercy Batidzirai, Ashenafi Argaw Yirga, Retius Chifurira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mkhombiseni Zamani SitholeSchool of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg Campus, College of Agriculture, Science and Engineering, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Jesca Mercy BatidziraiSchool of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg Campus, College of Agriculture, Science and Engineering, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Ashenafi Argaw YirgaSchool of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg Campus, College of Agriculture, Science and Engineering, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Retius ChifuriraSchool of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, College of Agriculture, Science and Engineering, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Condom use in Rwanda is a significant public health topic, especially in efforts to prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV/AIDS, unplanned pregnancies and other health problems such as cervical cancer. In Rwanda, the government and various organizations actively promote condom use through comprehensive sexual and reproductive health initiatives such as sexual health education and condom distribution in schools, communities and public places. Despite these efforts, many individuals still fail to adopt consistent condom use, leading to significant health consequences. To enhance health and condom promotion programs, it is crucial to understand the factors contributing to low condom use and to identify regions with the lowest uptake. Methods: This study analyzes data from the 2019/2020 Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (RDHS) to investigate the prevalence and determinants of condom use during the last sexual intercourse among reproductive-aged women in Rwanda. A geo-additive model was employed to account for geographical variation in condom use, enabling the identification of regional disparities and spatial patterns. These methodological approaches provide a robust framework for understanding individual and contextual factors influencing condom use in Rwanda. Results: The findings revealed a 10.8% prevalence of condom use and highlighted significant regional disparities in usage patterns. Women who reported living with a man had significantly lower odds of condom use compared to those not living with a man (AOR = 0.07, 95% CrI: 0.06-0.09). Those with primary education had significantly higher odds of condom use compared to those with no education (AOR = 1.39, 95% CrI: 1.04-1.84). Central and Northern districts, such as Ruhango and Musanze, showed positive structured spatial effects, suggesting regionally correlated factors promoting condom use. Unstructured spatial effects highlighted significant district-specific variations, with areas like Ruhango and Rusizi exhibiting higher odds of condom use, while Nyamagabe and Gasabo had lower odds. Conclusion: Spatial disparities in condom use suggest a need for region-specific interventions, particularly in the Southern and Northern regions of Rwanda. Efforts should focus on enhancing education access and economic empowerment while addressing cultural and relational barriers to condom use in cohabiting relationships.

Indexed as

CondomsSafe SexSpatial AnalysisAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedRwandaSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted DiseasesYoung Adultcondom usegeo-additive modelRwandaspatial analysiswomen

Identifiers

PMID40823242
PMCPMC12350240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.